Pastor Mark... You're Fired!

I have been meaning to write this for several weeks now and am finally getting around to it.  I wanted to share about some thoughts regarding the recent decision to remove Pastor Mark Driscoll from the pulpit at Mars Hill in Seattle.

In my opinion this decision should not surprise Pastor Mark at all.  After all he has associated himself with and has created group(s) that have been the “self proclaimed watchdogs” of the Gospel.  And now those groups have turned on him.  No surprise.  I believe that Pastor Mark lived by the sword therefore he died by it as well.

One thing I want to make clear is this.  I am not a Pastor Mark “fan” (meaning I do not follow him or read his stuff), but I do believe he is a minister of the Gospel and a solid believer in Jesus Christ.  Therefore I support him.  The way Mark is going to preach in Seattle (one of the most spiritually dark areas of this country) is going to be radically different that the way it is preached in Southern Georgia, or greater Dallas or the Northeast, etc… 

He brought the Gospel in a loud and powerful (sometimes offensive) way to throngs of people who may have needed to hear it in a “different” way.  Obviously… we must all be walking in the fruits of the Spirit (love, joy PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS…) so I am not making excuses for his brashness, but I will say he proclaimed the Gospel and that is key.

Just like Paul said in Philippians 1:15-18, “Some indeed preach Christ from envy and rivalry, but others from good will.  The latter do it out of love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel.  The former proclaim Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely but thinking to afflict me in my imprisonment.  What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that I rejoice.”

Paul rejoiced that the Gospel was being preached.  He was wise enough to overlook motives, methods and preferences.  I see no area in Marks preaching that would account for him being removed.  He is a hard headed man and difficult I’m sure but I would argue that the Apostles Peter and Paul would be “labeled” that as well.  Maybe we would have removed those 2 from the pulpit as well if we were around then?

The way one of our Christian bookstores have dealt with the matter is un-honoring as well.
Romans 12:10, “Love one another with brotherly affection. Outdo one another in showing honor.”  They have removed all his books from the store.  ALL OF THEM.  When INDEED there is much more damaging theology and dangerous “gospels” being preached out there in the same bookstores.  I find this a bit disturbing. 

The Church reacted to Rob Bell like this a few years ago.  Its amazing that we can love these guys so much one day and all they say yet the next day when they say something that the masses don’t agree with we want to burn them at the stake and burn all of their previous writings. A familiar story in Church History.

As we move forward from this I want to learn from it.  I may not agree with all the different views out there, ranging from baptism, foreknowledge, prophecy, evangelism, discipleship, leadership, men and women etc… Or the way it gets communicated or even the delivery method.  I will say though that I am very pleased that Jesus Christ and His Resurrection and He being the only way back to God is being proclaimed from the mouths of these people.  And in that I rejoice. 

How about you?

The New Testament is Corrupt!

Over the years I have been asked about the Bible (in particular the New Testament).  As a Bible teacher I encounter people on planes, airports or on the streets that I speak with regarding my faith in Jesus Christ.  And this is one of the most common questions, “The Bible has been changed (and specifically the New Testament).”

This always interest me because most people are just regurgitating something they heard a professor say or some other “religious leader” that thinks the NT has been corrupted.  Or read some “convincing article” on the internet that has lead them astray.

The fact of the matter is that the NT is accurate and has NEVER been changed.  It was not written hundreds of years after Christ.

The NT can compete up with any given classical piece of ancient literature (and actually has much more validity than many pieces of ancient literature COMBINED).

Look at these ancient writings.  Look at the date “Recorded” to “Dates of mss (manuscripts)” and “time span”.  The NT easily, by itself can stand against criticism.  The numbers speak for themselves.

 

It bothers me that universities will take a document written by Aristotle and see that there’s a1400 year time gap (time span) between the time it was written (recorded) and the earliest date of the manuscript (date of mss) and only have 40 copies and call writings like this 100% accurate.  When the New Testament has a 5-30 time gap and we have 5700 manuscripts that DO NOT contradict themselves.  The NT has greater historical validity and accuracy than any of Aristotle’s writings… combined!

Another question I would ask is, “The NT has been changed…really?  When and where?”  If there was any time in history that the NT was changed don’t you think that we could point back to it and say, “Right here.  Here is when it was changed.”  Don’t you hank that there would have been a huge roar in the early church?  And where are these “other documents”?  We do not seem to have any writing that are different from the NT.  We do have some i.e… the Gospel of Barnabas or the Gospel of Thomas or Judas.  All of these have been proven to be be forgeries. 

From bible.org, “How Accurate is the Bible?”
“The New Testament can be regarded as 99.5 percent pure, and the correct readings for the remaining 0.5 percent can often be ascertained with a fair degree of probability by the practice of textual criticism.  Some of these variant readings crept into the manuscripts because of visual errors in copying or because of auditory errors when a group of scribes copied manuscripts that were read aloud. Other errors resulted from faulty writing, memory, and judgment, and still others from well-meaning scribes who thought they were correcting the text. Nevertheless, only a small number of these differences affect the sense of the passages, and only a fraction of these have any real consequences. Furthermore, no variant readings are significant enough to call into question any of the doctrines of the New Testament.”

So next time someone asks you “How do you know the NT wasn't just made up and or changed?”  Just tell them because it makes no logical sense for one.  Secondly there is not one single shred of (good or reliable) evidence that is has been. 

Hope this helps.